Legal Opinion

Seewagen v. Vanderkluet

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1985No. 537, 538 Philadelphia, 1983PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

Kenneth Seewagen (“plaintiff”) filed actions in trespass against Hans Vanderkluet and Priscilla Vanderkluet, individually and trading as Red Lion Inn, and against Vanderk-luet, Inc., trading as Red Lion Inn (“defendants” or “appellants”). Plaintiff claimed that he sustained personal injury involving the loss of an eye caused by defendants’ negligence while plaintiff was business invitee on defendants’ premises. The actions were tried under the Comparative Negligence Act of July 9, 1976, as amended, 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 7102. 1 In response to special interrogatories, the jury found…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Fish v. GosnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Peair v. Home Ass'n of Enola Legion No. 751Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Abbott v. Steel City Piping Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Beary v. Container General Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Chiricos v. Forest Lakes Council Boy Scouts of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company, and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Graham v. Sky Haven Coal, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API