Legal Opinion
State v. Heltzel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1989No. 45A03-8802-CR-54PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
Appellant State of Indiana appeals a dismissal of a complaint for indirect contempt. *160The information for indirect contempt of court, filed by the Lake County prosecutor, reads in pertinent part:
“[0]n or about the 31st day of July, A.D.1987, ... MARK KIESLING AND WILLIAM HELTZEL induced or attempted to induce DENNIS LONG ... and RICKY MOYETT ..., members of the regular Lake County Grand Jury, duly sworn to secrecy and impaneled by the Honorable James C. Kimbrough, Judge, Lake Superior Court, Criminal Division, on July 18, 1984, to disclose evidence given or proceeding had, or to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- LaGRANGE ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. HeltzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HeltzelIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Pigman v. Evansville PressIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. HeltzelIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HeltzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989