Legal Opinion
State v. Heltzel
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1990No. 45S03-9003-CR-225PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DeBRULER, Justice.
William Heltzel and Mark Kiesling were charged with indirect contempt of court, 1.C. 34-47-38 through -5, in an information filed by the Lake County Prosecutor in August of 1987. At the time, Heltzel and Kiesling were reporters for the Hammond Times, and the contempt charges grew out of their questioning of two men who had served on a grand jury which had been impaneled on July 18, 1984, and discharged in January of 1985. The information charged that on or about July 81, 1987 Heltzel and Kiesling did
unlawfully induce or attempt to induce a Grand Juror to violate the secrecy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Butterworth v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re the Marriage of: Thomas Todd Reynolds v. Tricia ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re Contempt of Wabash Valley Hospital, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hoffmann-Pugh v. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Christie Wilson v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.