State v. Heltzel
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION TO DISMISS
HOFFMAN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a dismissal of a complaint for indirect contempt.
The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal asserting two grounds:(1) that the appellant failed to file a pre-appeal statement under Appellate Rule 2(C); and(2) that the motion to correct errors is defective in that it is not specific as required by Trial Rule 59(D)(2).
Proceedings for contempt of court are sui generis and both the Indiana Supreme Court and this Court have held that contempt proceedings are neither civil actions nor are they prosecutions for offenses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Linton v. LintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Niemeyer v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. ShumakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- State Ex Rel. Grile v. Allen Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Trotcky v. HutchinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- B.L. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. HeltzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. HeltzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989