Legal Opinion

Phillip Semmer Glass Co. v. Nassau Show-Case Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 15, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, first district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.

Each of the parties is a domestic corporation. The principal place of business of the plaintiff is in the county of *578New York, borough of Manhattan, first district. The principal place of business of the defendant is in the county of Kings. This action was commenced in the Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, third district. On the return of the summons, it appeared that neither corporation had its principal place of business within that district, and that plaintiff’s principal place of business was located within the first district of the borough of Manhattan. On the defendant’s motion the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  2. Rieser v. Charles F. Parker & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CromeyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1941
  2. Needham Piano & Organ Co. v. PowellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  3. Needham Piano & Organ Co. v. PowellAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  4. Reitman v. NeulanderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  5. Reitman v. NeulanderAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API