Reitman v. Neulander
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Action by Albert Reitman against Morris Neulander and Edward Roth. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Per curiam
It appears affirmatively in the record that the defendant Neulander is a resident of the county of Kings, while the residence of the defendant Roth is not disclosed. Under our recent decisions (Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. Rep. 151, 59 N. Y. Supp. 266, 319; Philip Semmer Glass Co. v. Nassau. Show-Case Co., 28 Misc. Rep. 577, 59 N. Y. Supp. 530), the court had no jurisdiction over the defendant Neulander, and could not render judgment against the defendant Roth without proof of his residence in the county of New York. The judgment must be reversed. Judgment reversed absolutely as to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tyroler v. GummersbachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Phillip Semmer Glass Co. v. Nassau Show-Case Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899