Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Cromey

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 4, 1941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWhalen, J.

Defendant Rector, Warden and Vestrymen of Emanuel Church appears specially herein and moves to set aside the service of the summons upon said defendant, a domestic religious corporation, on the ground that the court has acquired no jurisdiction of said defendant. The summons was served on an officer, namely, a warden, of the corporation, at his law office in the city of New York. In the affidavit annexed to the notice of special appearance required by section 88 of the Municipal Court Code, the ground of the objection is stated to be that said defendant has its situs in the county of Suffolk,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills v. MenefeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Robert Dollar Co. v. Canadian Car & Foundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Worthington v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Tyroler v. GummersbachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewandowski v. GoldbergNassau County District Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API