Drayton v. Commissioner of Correction
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.
The plaintiff, a pro se inmate, filed an action against the defendants in the nature of certiorari under G. L. c. 249, § 4,2 claiming that procedural irregularities in a *136disciplinary proceeding violated his right to due process under both the Federal and State Constitutions and the regulations of the Department of Correction (department). The plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment3 and the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Although the motion judge stated that it appeared that the plaintiff had been denied the right to present material evidence and to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- James Dominique v. William WeldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- City of Gloucester v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District Commonwealth v. RoberioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Schofield v. ClarkeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Haverty v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Planning Board of BourneMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Larson v. CooperAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.