Legal Opinion

Larson v. Cooper

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2004No. S-10327, S-10431PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Does a prison violate a maximum security prisoner’s constitutional rights by limiting his physical contact with his wife to a brief kiss and embrace at the beginning and end of her visits? In S-10327, we hold that the free exercise of religion clause of the federal constitution does not require the prison to allow hand-holding, kissing, and embracing throughout the visit, because we conclude that the visitation rules are reasonably related to legitimate penological objectives. We also hold that the free exercise clause of the Alaska Constitution does…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Adkins v. StanselAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sharpe v. SharpeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Diaz v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Leahy v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API