Legal Opinion

McCorkle v. Aeroglide Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1994No. 9310SC755PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

In this case involving a workplace injury, plaintiff contends the trial court erred by granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. We disagree.

On 19 May 1989, Nick McCorkle, Jr. (Nick) was injured when his hands were caught in a brake-press machine at the Cary, N.C. sheet metal plant of his employer, defendant Aeroglide Corporation (Aeroglide). Brake-press machines are utilized by Aeroglide to form metal into various shapes and angles. Defendant Barbour was Nick’s supervisor and defendant Davis was an Aeroglide employee whose job was to repair and maintain production…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Pendergrass v. Card Care, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trivette v. YountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Doe v. The University of North Carolina SystemDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
  3. Nations v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API