Keifer v. Myers
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSiiaw, J.
Appeal from a judgment of nonsuit.
At the time in question the Sanitary Laundry Company was a corporation with a capital stock of $40,000, divided into four hundred shares of the par value of $100 each. Of this stock the appellant, J. H. Keifer, owned one hundred and ninety-eight shares, one George R. Myers owned one hundred and ninety-eight shares, and the remaining four shares were owned by three other persons, who, with said Keifer and said George R. Myers, constituted the board of directors of said corporation. The corporation was in financial distress, and it appears that neither…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Hanley v. California Bridge & Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Husheon v. HusheonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Watkins v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Farmer v. GroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keifer v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Federal Insurance Company v. Tungsten Heavy Powder & Parts, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Newlin v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913