Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Stowe Highlands Resort PUD to PRD Application

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 23, 2009No. 08-058PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. This is an appeal from an Environmental Court decision affirming, after an on-the-record review, the rejection by the Town of Stowe’s Development Review Board (DRB) of appellant Stowe Highland’s application to convert its zoning permit for the Stowe Club development from a Resort Planned Unit Development (Resort PUD) to a Planned Residential Development (PRD). The Environmental Court upheld the DRB’s decision as supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

¶ 2. Since our decision in In re 232511 Investments, Ltd., 2006 VT 27, 179 Vt. 409, 898 A.2d 109, Stowe Highlands has twice moved to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. In Re Appeal of 232511 Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Devers-Scott v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Badger v. RiceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Madowitz v. Woods at Killington Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In re Stowe Highlands Merger/Subdivision ApplicationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  3. In re Ferrera & Fenn Gravel PitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Madowitz v. WOODS AT KILLINGTON OWNERSSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. Montgomery v. 232511 Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2012

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API