Legal Opinion

People v. Garrett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. 106PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In my opinion, the evidence of the officers justified the securing of the liquor without a search warrant. Officer O'Connor testified:

"My attention was called to these gentlemen that afternoon about 3 o'clock. They were staggering around. They were intoxicated. We went up to them and asked them what they were doing. They said none of your business. I asked them if they had an automobile there and they said yes. I asked them where it was and they went direct to their car. It was a Franklin sedan. We looked in the car and through the window we could see a bottle in the door of the car and also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People v. KamhoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. KrahnMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Hanger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. HaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Atkins v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API