Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Harris

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

The principal determinative question on this appeal is the validity of the search of the trunk of an automobile following a lawful arrest.

The proceedings herein were commenced by Joe Harris for the purpose of obtaining a return to him of his Chevrolet automobile which had been seized and confiscated by the Commissioner of Finance and Taxation pursuant to T.C.A. sec. 57-622 et seq. The hearing officer of the department, after hearing the evidence, found that the automobile Avas property confiscated and that there Avas no evidence that the statute was not property complied Avith. He dismissed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Elliott Et Ux. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. McCanless, Com'r v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dolen v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McArthur v. PenningtonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1963
  2. Bromley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. State v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Pierce v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. CottrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API