Legal Opinion

State v. Haney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1965No. 169PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, as we must in considering a motion for nonsuit, it was amply sufficient to establish that defendant Haney, if not the owner, was the operator and controller of the Pontiac, the automobile in which one robbery was perpetrated and another attempted.’ Defendant Haney stopped the Pontiac while Tomberlin took the dollar bill from Sims at knifepoint. Haney drove the car back to the bowling alley where the Volkswagen was parked and stopped the Pontiac while the Sims automobile was searched. The record does not reveal whether it was Haney…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CyrWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. State v. HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. Williams and WannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Commonwealth v. CockfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. State v. GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API