Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Palumbo Bros.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 8, 1992No. 90 C 7441PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MAROVICH, District Judge.
The qui tam plaintiffs, Neil F. Hartigan, former Attorney General for the State of Illinois and the State of Illinois (the “plaintiffs” or “Illinois”), filed a fifteen-count complaint against twenty-eight individuals and entities involved in the construction industry in the Midwest (the “defendants”). The complaint was filed pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (“FCA”). The plaintiffs seek recovery of damages, penalties, interest, fees and costs on behalf of themselves and as realtors for the United States of America. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Allen Lamers v. City of Green BayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- U.S. Ex Rel. Lamers v. City of Green BayDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- United States ex rel. Stevens v. Vermont Agency of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Jana, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.