Legal Opinion

Moreno v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2015No. 6982 S-15067/S-15070PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

"Trial errors to which the parties did not object are reviewed for plain error." 1 In Adams v. State we held that plain error is "an error that (1) was not the result of intelligent waiver or a tactical decision not to object; (2) was obvious; (8) affected substantial rights; and (4) was prejudicial. 2 These consolidated cases require us to clarify the standard for determining when a defendant intelligently waived an objection or made a tactical decision not to object.

Defendants in two eriminal cases failed to object to errors at trial: in Moreno v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Dorman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Pulakis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Gafford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. In the Interest of J.C., Minor Child J.C., Minor ChildSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. State v. RansteadAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Goldsbury v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API