Legal Opinion

Barrell v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries sustained while working on the defendant’s vessel, the Wauna. Plaintiff’s pleading sought recovery under two theories: negligence (the Jones Act, 46 USCA § 688), and unseaworthiness. The ease was submitted to the jury under both of plaintiff’s theories. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant appeals.

The principal issue on appeal, as stated by the defendant, is: “Hid the circuit court rule correctly in removing from jury consideration defendant’s conten tion that the vessel was a dead ship and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Roper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Simpson v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROVIDENCE, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Arp v. KerriganOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Jussila v. Sause Bros. Ocean Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Beauchamp v. Sause Bros. Ocean Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API