Legal Opinion

State v. Linden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1983No. 17762PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted at a jury trial of two counts of arson. 1 He now appeals, alleging that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Specifically, he contends (1) that testimony that defendant was in California when the crime was committed was sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt as to his guilt, and (2) that there was a substantial likelihood of irreparable mis-identification by the two identifying witnesses.

Defendant and his father were both charged with arson of a house located at 3823 West 3500 South in Salt Lake County. 2 Defendant’s father was purchasing the house…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. McCumberUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. RomeroUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. GorlickUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. KimbelUtah Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BookerUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. RoyballUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. LindenUtah Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API