Legal Opinion

Lecat's Ventriloscope v. MT Tool and Manufacturing

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 11, 2018No. 1:16-cv-05298Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LECAT’S VENTRILOSCOPE, } ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 16 € 5298 v. ) ) Chief Judge Rubén Castillo MT TOOL AND MANUFACTURING, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Lecat’s Ventriloscope (“Plaintiff”) filed this suit against MT Tool and Manufacturing (“Defendant”) for alleged infringement of

U.S. Patent No. 7,645,141

(“the ‘141 Patent”). (R. 1, Compl.) Generally speaking, the invention disclosed and claimed in the ‘141 Patent is a device to help train physicians and other medical professionals in the use of “auscultation”…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Richard Williamson v. Citrix Online, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API