Legal Opinion
Furst & Thomas v. Sandlin
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 30, 1922No. 8 Div. 404PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Appellants brought this suit against the appellees as guarantors for the performance of a certain written contract entered into between the appellants and one L. T. Sandlin. There was verdict and judgment for the defendants, from which the appeal is prosecuted.
The first insistence by counsel for appellants is that the contract here in question was made in Illinois, and governed by the laws of that state.
It appears without dispute that said contract signed by the principal, L. T. Sandlin, and also by these defendants as guarantors, was forwarded by mail from this state to the plaintiffs at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Milliken v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Walker v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
- Deavors v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Southern Express Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- J. R. Watkins Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Harrison v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Ideal Structures Corporation v. Levine Huntsville Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Cincinnati Ins. Co., Inc. v. GirodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.