Cincinnati Ins. Co., Inc. v. Girod
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a dismissal of the plaintiff's declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that it was not liable under a homeowner's insurance policy for additional uninsured motorist coverage claimed by the defendant. The dismissal was premised upon the trial court's determination that the plaintiff had failed to join certain indispensable parties pursuant to Rule 19, A.R.Civ.P., namely the defendant's children.
In April 1988, Morton and Mary Girod, husband and wife, were issued a homeowner's insurance policy through Cincinnati Insurance Company of Cincinnati, Ohio…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Harrison v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Coastal States Life Insurance Company v. GassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Furst & Thomas v. SandlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cherokee Ins. Co., Inc. v. SanchesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Universal Underwriters Insurance Company, a Stock Insurance Company v. Stokes Chevrolet, Inc., James H. Stokes Kirk A. StokesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Kruger Commodities, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & GuarantyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Lemuel v. Admiral Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
- Ferris v. JenningsDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.