Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1898No. 18,269PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

This was an action by the appellant for damages resulting in his personal injury, and from the negligence of the appellee.

The lower court sustained the appellee’s demurrer to the complaint, and that ruling alone is assigned as error. It was alleged that the Louisville and Jefferson-ville Bridge Company had just completed its bridge across the Ohio river, between the cities of Louisville and Jeffersonville, together with the approaches or viaducts leading to such bridge; that said bridge had not been opened to the regular public traffic, and notice had been given that it would not be so opened…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Billman v. Indianapolis, Cincinnati & Lafayette RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. TrowbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Chicago & Erie Railway Co. v. CummingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Tipton Light, Heat & Power Co. v. NewcomerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API