Legal Opinion
Gamel v. City of Cincinnati
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2010No. 10-3665PublishedCited by 261 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises the procedural question of whether the district court abused its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs state-law claims after all of their federal claims were voluntarily dismissed. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
I. BACKGROUND
The Cincinnati City Council adopted Ordinance No. 360-2009 in November 2009, which for the first time requires City retirees to pay for part of their post-retirement health-insurance benefits. In response, the retirees…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Ronald A. Landefeld v. Marion General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by261 opinions
- Charvat v. NMP, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Alexander v. RosenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Royal Truck & Trailer Sales v. Mike KraftCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Golf Village N., LLC v. City of Powell, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Veneklase v. Bridgewater Condos, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.