Legal Opinion
Application of Theodore W. Zierden
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 19, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8161PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Acting Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the rejection of claims 1, 2, and 6 of application serial No. 352,337, filed March 16, 1964, entitled “Methods and Compo-
sitions for Removing Alluvium and Other Deposits in Water Systems.” Six claims have been allowed.
The appealed claims are for a method (claims 1 and 2) and composition (claim 6) useful for removing and preventing alluvium deposits in water systems where the water employed is derived from “rivers, ponds, lakes or other sources of impure…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Arthur R. Tomlinson, Harry H. Hall and William F. GeigleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Application of Alan J. Lemin, Arnolds Steinhards and Gerald A. BoyackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Becket v. ArnessCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
3Cited by13 opinions
- Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re SchreiberCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In re PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Arctic Cat Inc. v. Gep Power Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- In Re SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.