Legal Opinion

Becket v. Arness

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 24, 1940No. 4320PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaNd, Judge

The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences in awarding priority of invention defined by the one count involved to William B. Arness, the appellee, and the appellant, Frederick M. Becket, has appealed here from its decision.

*1252The interference is between an application of Becket, filed August 14, 1934, which ripened into patent No. 2,056,766 on October 6, 1936, and an application of Arness filed November 28, 1936, seven weeks after the date of the Becket patent. Upon the filing dates, Arness was the junior party. He based his…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. George E. Hall, Jr. v. Louis B. TaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
  2. Application of Theodore W. ZierdenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Georgia Kaolin Co. v. Thiele Kaolin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Application of Theodore W. ZierdenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Crucible Steel Co. v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API