Legal Opinion
United States v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1948No. 10780PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge,
This appeal presents the direct question: Does the Royalty Adjustment Act of October 31, 1942, U.S.C.A., Title 35, §§ 89-96, apply to payments of money made in settlement of claims for damages for past infringement of patents? The district court held that sums aggregating $9,749,000 so paid and on deposit in the registry of the court are not “royalties” and are, therefore, not within the purview of the Royalty Adjustment Act.
The United States has appealed from the denial of its motion for a preliminary injunction impounding, pendente lite, the aforementioned amount in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Alma Motor Co. v. Timken-Detroit Axle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. BligeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Spiller & Spiller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Thomas Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
- Ransburg Electro-Coating Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Spiller and Spiller, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Third-Party v. Ionic Electrostatic Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.