Legal Opinion
Herbert Schoenbrod, as Trustee, Etc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 16, 1969No. 91-67PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DURFEE, Judge.
On June 20, 1962, the Department of the Interior issued an Invitation for Proposals for processing and selling Alaska sealskins for the account of the United States. Eighty firms were solicited and raw skins were furnished to eleven of them for sample processing. Five proposals were submitted.
The samples which were submitted were subjected to a series of inspections and tests. While this was going on, discussions were being held with the participating firms, concerning the nature and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- G. L. Christian and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Prestex Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Gould, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Serco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and Lucent Technologies Inc., United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.