Legal Opinion

Ravlin v. Hood River Peoples' Utility District

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

These two suits — consolidated here and in the lower court for hearing — challenge the validity of the organization of the Hood River Peoples’ Utility District and the election of its board of directors. The facts are undisputed.

On March 10, 1938, separate voters’ preliminary petitions were filed with the Hydroelectric Commission of Oregon requesting a preliminary investigation as to the advisability of creating a peoples’ utility district comprised of the entire territory within the corporate limits of the city of Hood River and certain unincorporated territory in Hood River county. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re Board of Directors of Tillamook People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Brown v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Clam River Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Board of Directors of Northern Wasco County People's Utility District v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API