Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Bailey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This proceeding is in the nature of quo warranto. The complaint was filed September 11, 1935, or two years, one month and thirteen days after said canvass and proclamation by the county court.. The plaintiff assigns as error, among other things, the finding of the court that the notice of election complied in form and substance with section 65-703, Oregon Code 1930; that the Port of The Dalles is a legal public corporation, duly created and existing by virtue of the laws of Oregon pertaining to the creation and existence of ports, and that each of defendants are the legal, qualified and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  2. Knox County v. Ninth National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. State v. Port of TillamookOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bennett Trust Co. v. SengstackenOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. SengstackenOregon Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. School District No. 17 v. PowellOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Witham v. McNuttOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Weatherford v. HayworthOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Brewster v. OstranderOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Ravlin v. Hood River Peoples' Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API