Legal Opinion

Spriggs Enterprises, Inc. v. Purcell Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1984No. 83-162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

Petitioners Purcell and Lake Forest obtained a reversal of judgments against them in Purcell Company, Inc., v. Spriggs Enterprises, Inc., 431 So.2d 515 (Ala.1983), in which this Court rendered judgment for Purcell and Lake Forest and ordered costs taxed against appellees. Purcell and Lake Forest petitioned the trial court to include the premiums of their supersedeas bonds as costs. Upon the denial of that petition, Purcell and Lake Forest filed this petition for writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to include the premiums as costs.

Rule 35, A.R.A.P., includes the provision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Purcell Co., Inc. v. Spriggs Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Ex parte CuddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. State v. InmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Betts v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Shoals Ford, Inc. v. McKinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Dyson Conveyor Maint., Inc. v. Young & Vann Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Hinkle v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. United Companies Fin. Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API