Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Cargill, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 21, 1992No. 1901913PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bill and Louise Hinkle filed an action, alleging promissory fraud and breach of an oral contract, against Cargill, Inc.1 ("Cargill"), and against its employee, Homer Griffin. According to the Hinkles, Cargill breached an oral contract to provide chickens for the Hinkles' newly constructed chicken house until the 20-year construction loan was repaid. The Hinkles also alleged that Griffin committed promissory fraud when he represented that Cargill would provide chickens for the duration of the loan, and the Hinkles alleged that Cargill should be held liable for this fraud. The trial court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Purcell Co., Inc. v. Spriggs Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Old Southern Life Insurance Company v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Kennedy's Heirs v. Kennedy's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  4. Turner v. BiscoeTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Walker v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bruce v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Holman v. Childersburg Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Schaller Telephone Co. v. Golden Sky Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  4. DeFriece v. McCorquodaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Freeman v. Cargill, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API