Legal Opinion

Greear v. Paust

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1934No. 29,699PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her a new trial.

The action is to recover damages for fraud and misrepresentation inducing plaintiff to trade Canadian lands for the Mayfair Apartments in Minneapolis. There were several defendants, and conspiracy to defraud was alleged; but before the trial closed the action was dismissed as to all except defendants Paust and Solberg, and no question is raised as to the court’s action in that respect. The title to the Canadian lands had originally been in plaintiff’s husband, but at the time of this transaction plaintiff was the owner and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Erickson v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Nelson v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Kempf v. RangerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. Kaehler v. KaehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. General Corporation v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960
  5. Gaertner v. ReesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API