Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1892PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal by Mary A. Cremer and William J. Cremer, two of the defendants, from a judgment of the District Court of St. Louis County, Ensign, J., entered February 11, 1892. Theodore M. Erickson, in December, 1889, owned Lot 317, Block 72, of Duluth Proper, Second Division, and a livery stable, and outfit thereon. Mary A. Cremer owned twenty lots in Ivy Hill Falls Addition to St. Paul, and twenty-three lots in McCloud’s Park Addition to South St. Paul.

Read the full summary

Appeal by Mary A. Cremer and William J. Cremer, two of the defendants, from a judgment of the District Court of St. Louis County, Ensign, J., entered February 11, 1892. Theodore M. Erickson, in December, 1889, owned Lot 317, Block 72, of Duluth Proper, Second Division, and a livery stable, and outfit thereon. Mary A. Cremer owned twenty lots in Ivy Hill Falls Addition to St. Paul, and twenty-three lots in McCloud’s Park Addition to South St. Paul. December 30th, Erickson and William F. Fisher, Jr., entered into a written contract by the terms of which Erickson agreed to convey to Fisher the…

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action for the rescission, on the ground of fraud, of an executed contract, by which plaintiff exchanged cer*302tain real and personal property in Duluth for certain lots in “Ivy Hill Falls addition to St. Paul,” and a mortgage for $ 10,000 on certain other lots in “McCloud’s Park addition to South St. Paul.”

Plaintiff made the trade with defendant Fisher as principal, but in fact Fisher was acting in behalf of the Cremers, and immediately transferred all the proceeds of the transaction to Mrs. Cremer. From an examination of the evidence, we are perfectly satisfied that it fully…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MyrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Maxfield v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Bostwick v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Fargo Gas & Coke Co. v. Fargo Gas & Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API