Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Jenkins
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 4, 2024No. 4:23-cv-05036Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JACK ARNE FRIEDMAN, Case No. 23-cv-05036-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT 9 v. BROOKE JENKINS' MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 10 BROOKE JENKINS, et al., COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 39 12 Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) 13 and motion to strike Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages filed by Defendant Brooke Jenkins. 14 The Court has reviewed the parties’ papers, the record in this case, and relevant legal authority, 15 and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- John Faulkner v. Adt Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.