Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ricker

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1964No. Civ. No. 10705PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Plaintiffs sought to enjoin defendants’ use of a roadway or former roadway traversing plaintiffs’ land. The lower court granted the injunction and defendants appeal.

Plaintiffs Smith and defendants Ricker own adjoining properties in Shasta County some miles east of Redding. Both properties are crossed by Cedar Creek, which flows in a southwesterly direction. During the 1890’s and for some years thereafter Shasta County maintained a traveled roadway across both properties, parallel to and east of Cedar Creek. About 1918 the road became part of the state highway between Redding and Alturas.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Wright v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Jordan v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Norcross v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. VallejosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API