Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2008No. S149123PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

When, if ever, does a prosecutor’s advocacy of third party interests in the course of a criminal discovery dispute rise to the level of a conflict of interest justifying recusal? Here, the trial court concluded that a prosecutor who advocates a position of benefit to a third party in a discovery dispute effectively assumes representation of that party and thus has a conflict supporting recusal.

In two companion cases issued today, we reaffirm that the standard of review for assessing a trial court determination concerning prosecutorial recusal is abuse of discretion.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. KaurishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Shadonna C.California Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API