People v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
When, if ever, does a prosecutor’s advocacy of third party interests in the course of a criminal discovery dispute rise to the level of a conflict of interest justifying recusal? Here, the trial court concluded that a prosecutor who advocates a position of benefit to a third party in a discovery dispute effectively assumes representation of that party and thus has a conflict supporting recusal.
In two companion cases issued today, we reaffirm that the standard of review for assessing a trial court determination concerning prosecutorial recusal is abuse of discretion.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. KaurishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Shadonna C.California Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.