Moritz v. Byerly
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal involves the sole question whether a court (here the district court) has jurisdiction of a counterclaim which is in amount below its minimum jurisdiction, the counterclaim not arising out of the same transaction as plaintiff's claim, but being of the general character warranting set off; and being pleaded only by way of set-off, without prayer for affirmative relief. The facts are these: The suit was by Mrs. Byerly (her husband joining her pro forma) against Moritz upon two promissory notes for the principal sum of $250 each, besides attorney's fees, executed by Moritz and payable…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Middlebrook & Brother v. David Bradley Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
- Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
- Long v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Dallas v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Pearlstone Mill & Elevator Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gallagher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Byke v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Watkins v. CossaboomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Andel v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Byke v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.