Legal Opinion

Moritz v. Byerly

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 10, 1945No. 9491PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal involves the sole question whether a court (here the district court) has jurisdiction of a counterclaim which is in amount below its minimum jurisdiction, the counterclaim not arising out of the same transaction as plaintiff's claim, but being of the general character warranting set off; and being pleaded only by way of set-off, without prayer for affirmative relief. The facts are these: The suit was by Mrs. Byerly (her husband joining her pro forma) against Moritz upon two promissory notes for the principal sum of $250 each, besides attorney's fees, executed by Moritz and payable…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Middlebrook & Brother v. David Bradley Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gimbel & Son v. J. Gomprecht & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Long v. City of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. City of Dallas v. RutledgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Pearlstone Mill & Elevator Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Byke v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Watkins v. CossaboomCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Andel v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Byke v. City of Corpus ChristiCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API