Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Rutledge

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 2, 1924No. 8946PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLooney, J.

The plaintiff, W. J. Rutledge, Jr., filed this suit against the city of Dallas, its mayor, board of commissioners, secretary and collector of the water and sewerage departments, A. W. Walker, and F. G. Van Valkenberg, for the issuance of an injunction to prevent his premises from being disconnected from the sewer main in the alley to the rear of his lot. Plaintiff won in the court below, and the city has op-pealed. t

The facts material for our consideration are these:

On March 8, 1914, the city of Dallas and the Southern Methodist University ffiade a contract under which the University was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Peters v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Moore Son v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Eckford v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Loomis v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. RowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. McNeill v. HubertTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Apex Financial Corp. v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Barfield v. Holland, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API