Legal Opinion

Russell v. Banks

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 1909No. Civ. No. 610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. M. S. Sayre, Judge presiding. The facts rare stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $873 under the terms of a certain lease executed by said plaintiff to one N. J. Waymire, and prays for judgment for that sum.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendants for costs was rendered and caused to be entered by the court.

The plaintiff appeals from said judgment, on a bill of exceptions.

Respondents first object to the consideration of this appeal upon the alleged ground that jurisdiction to do so has not been conferred because of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Canale v. CopelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Gustafson v. Stockton & Tuolumne County RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Brown v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gordon Bldg. Corp. v. Gibraltar Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Deakyne v. Lewes Anglers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
  3. Colusa Milling Co. v. Draper Dray & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API