Torner v. Reagen
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Justice.
This is a tort action, brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against the commissioner of the Iowa department of human services. The question is whether the commissioner enjoys qualified immunity for the actions which form the basis of this suit. We think qualified immunity is a defense under the circumstances. Hence we reverse a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff.
This suit is another result of the matters outlined in Torner by Torner v. State, 399 N.W.2d 381 (Iowa 1987). As detailed there, the department of human services determined that Bernice Tomer became ineligible…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gloria Llaguno v. Edward MingeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dickerson v. MertzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996