Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Mertz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 17, 1996No. 94-2041PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Chief Justice.

The issue in the present case is whether a genuine issue of material fact exists that would justify allowing plaintiffs state tort claims and federal civil rights claim against defendants to proceed to trial. As we believe there is not, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment for defendants.

I. Background facts and proceedings. At all times material to this controversy, defendants John Mertz and Darrell Batterson were employed as full-time conservation peace officers in the law enforcement bureau of the Iowa department of natural resources. They had…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Shannon and Danny NELSON, Individually, and on Behalf of E.N. F/K/A E.N., a Minor, Appellees, v. Lynn M. LINDAMAN, Lynn M. Lindaman, M.D., P.L.C. D/B/A Lindaman Orthopaedic, and Mercy Medical Center—Des Moines, AppellantsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Phillip E. Jones v. University of Iowa the Board of Regents for the State of Iowa Sally Mason, President of the University of Iowa and Individually and the Stolar Partnership, LLPSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  3. Hlubek v. PeleckySupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Dennis L. Smith v. Iowa State University of Science and Technology and State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. Green v. Racing Ass'n of Central IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API