Legal Opinion

United States v. R.W. Meyer

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 9, 1991No. 89-2236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

932 F.2d 568

33 ERC 1041, 60 USLW 2059, 21 Envtl.

L. Rep. 21,062

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,

v.

R.W. MEYER, INC., Defendant/Third Party, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Northernaire Plating Company, Willard S. Garwood,

Defendants/Third Party, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

City of Cadillac, Third Party Defendant, Fourth Party Plaintiff.

No. 89-2236.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 5, 1990.

Decided May 9, 1991.

1

Susan J. Bradley (argued), Jon D. VanderPloeg, Smith, Haughey, Rice & Roegge, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendant-appellant R.W. Meyer, Inc.

2

Michael P. McCasey, Miles J. Murphy…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. CarmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Lammers Barrel PRP Group v. Carboline CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API