Legal Opinion
Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Carman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 10, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 86-4462PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This action was brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., as amended by the Multiemployer *1088Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA,” “the Act” or “the statute”). Both parties have moved to vacate in part and to enforce in part the arbitration award.
In its complaint, filed July 28, 1986, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (“A & P” or “employer”) sought a declaratory judgment of this Court that two amendments adopted by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regan v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Greater Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. CarmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992