Legal Opinion

Lammers Barrel PRP Group v. Carboline Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 27, 2020No. 3:17-cv-00135Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION LAMMERS BARREL PRP . GROUP, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-00135 v. "JUDGE WALTER H. RICE CARBOLINE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. □ DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT DAYTON INDUSTRIAL DRUM, INC. (DOC. #61); OVERRULING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT DAYTON INDUSTRIAL DRUM (DOC. #64); AND SUSTAINING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. (DOC. #67); CONFERENCE CALL SET FOR TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 2020, AT…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Willie Love TALLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRAVO PITINO RESTAURANT, LTD., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API