Legal Opinion

Cusano v. Lajoie

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 12, 2017No. AC39279PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBear, J.

The defendants, Edward Lajoie and Kathleen Weaver, 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the plaintiff, Christopher Cusano, for additur in the amount of $2000. On appeal, the defendants argue that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion for additur. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The plaintiff filed this action following a minor car accident that occurred on July 4, 2014, in which Weaver's vehicle, while being driven by Lajoie, rear-ended the plaintiff's vehicle. The collision caused the plaintiff's…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Schroeder v. Triangulum AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Fileccia v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Turner v. PascarelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. Smith v. LefebreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maldonado v. FlannerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. Maldonado v. FlanneryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  3. Hassett v. Secor's Auto Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API