Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance Co. v. Loctite Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 23, 1984No. C0-83-1423PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Loctite Corporation appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial on the grounds of errors of law occurring at trial, of a verdict not justified by the evidence and that the verdicts were irreconcilable and inconsistent. We reverse.
FACTS
Mary Rustad was severely injured on August 10, 1975, when her camper caught fire. The fire was traced to a propane gas leak from a fractured brass fitting, a “B” nut, on a hose inside the camper floor.
Respondent Continental Insurance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farr v. Armstrong Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Myron F. Skillin v. Earle W. Kimball, Etc., Therm'x CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Donald E. Ludwig v. Marion Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Masepohl v. American Tobacco Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Shigellosis LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Swanstrom v. Teledyne Continental Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.