Mazzucco v. North Carolina Board of Medical Examiners
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
The defendants’ motion under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss for failure of the complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted will only be allowed when, under former practice, a demurrer would have been sustained because the complaint affirmatively discloses that the plaintiff had no cause of action against the defendant. Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 176 S.E. 2d 161 (1970) ; Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435, 204 S.E. 2d 534 (1974).
The Board of Medical Examiners of the State of North Carolina was created by the General Assembly in 1859 “to properly regulate the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Great American Insurance Company v. GoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Dockery v. Lampart Table Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Jones v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Smith v. McDonaldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Corum v. University of North Carolina Ex Rel. Board of GovernorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.