Legal Opinion
Hargrave v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1955No. 48899PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
Plaintiffs’ petition is filed in two counts; the first count alleging a Lucas Act 1 claim, and the second count claiming damages for breach of contract arising from an airport construction project at Enid, Oklahoma.
The second amended petition herein was signed by F. M. Hargrave, d/b/a Hargrave Construction Company, for use and benefit of L. B. Fugitt and Carroll Johnston d/b/a Kanotex Construction Company, and two surety companies. Hargrave has no financial interest in any of the claims made.
On March 26, 1943, Hargrave entered into a contract with the United States to furnish…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Addison Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Kremer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Commerce International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Seger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Rhen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.