United States v. Phillip P. Tomasetta
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MeENTEE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction in the district of Massachusetts for violation of the loan sharking provisions of the Consumer Credit Protection Act of 1968 — specifically, participation in the collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means. 18 U.S.C. § 894 (Supp. V, 1970). He argues, inter alia, that the indictment 1 lacks the specificity required by Fed.R.Crim.P. 7(c) and that the statute is unconstitutional. We deal first with the question of the sufficiency of the indictment.
Defendant contends that the indictment is defective because it fails to name…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. John WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Jose Demetrio Arteaga-Limones and Mike Lozano CantuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- United States v. AbramsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.